Biographies of archaeologists

Try the literature selection service. You can always turn off the advertisement. In Addition to S. Matveev, The Expedition Was Attended by A. Smirnov, A Post-Graduate Student of the Institute of Archeology and Art Studies, For Whom the Udmurt Theme Will Later Become One of the Key Oones in Scientific Research. HIS Work Has Been Repeatedly Analyzed in the Archaeological Literature.

UNFORTUNATELY, BIOGRAPHICAL Information ABOUT S. Matveev Is Very Sparse: The Dates of His Life Are Ungnown, And Information ABOUT HIS PLACE OF WORKE Contradictory. In Various Sources, Russian Archival and Museum Collections Managed to Collect as Yet Little Information ABOUT THE SCIENTIST. They Need to be Systematized in Order to get a first approximation of the passonality of the archhaeologist, Who is the Author of Two Scientific Resetarch Programs on The Archaeological Study of the Territory of Udmurtia.

The first of them was set out in a votter to the Votsk Regional Executive Committe During the Discussion of Plans for the Work of Metropolitan Archaeologists in the Region in Region Inn , The Second a Year Later in When Discussing Research for Subsequent Years. Biographical Information ABOUT S. MATVEV is of intersterest for understanding the development of udmurt archeology.

IS Significant in the Context of the ForMation of the First Soviet Generation of Russian Archaeologists, Including the Fact that S. Matvev Was A Student of the Outstanding Russian Archaeologist V. The work of the expedition, in addition to S. Matveev, took part in the graduate student of the Institute of Archeology and the Association of the Russian Association of Scientific Institutes of Public Sciences A.

Smirnov, for whom the Finno-Permian theme subsequently became one of the key in scientific research. His work was repeatedly analyzed in archaeological literature. Unfortunately, biographical data about S. Matveev is very stingy: the dates of his life are unknown, information about the place of his work is contradictory. In different sources, it was possible to collect a few more information about the scientist.

They need systematization in order to make an idea of ​​the personality of the archaeologist - the author of two scientific research programs on archaeological study of the territory of Udmurtia. The first of the programs was presented in a letter to the Votsky Regional Executive Committee during the discussion of the plans of the work of metropolitan archaeologists in the region in the city of biographical information about S.

Matveeva is of understanding the directions of development of Udmurt archeology: they are significant in the context of the history of the formation of the first Soviet generation of archaeologists, including the fact that S. Matveev was an outstanding Russian archaeologist V. Keywords: History of archeology, Votsky Autonomous Region, S. Matveev, V. DOI: It formed a department of museums, monuments of antiquity, art and folk life with an archaeological subdivision.

The history of this expedition is repeatedly described in the scientific literature [Melnikova]. Bryusov and S. Matveev [Melnikova, 98]. As you know, instead of A. Bryusov, A. Smirnov arrived in VAO with S. Matveev, for the research of which the Finno-Permian theme later became key for many years. The Glavnauka was issued an open sheet for the right to produce archaeological excavations in the VAO to the scientific secretary of the archaeological subdivision of the Glavnauki S.

Smirnov [Melnikova,]. In the city of Biography, A. Smirnov was repeatedly considered in the literature [for example, in the scientific heritage of Matveevs are unknown. A graduate student A. Smirnov, an antiquity researcher in the north of Udmurtia M. Matveev was repressed. From what we know about S. Matveev, this is a textbook mention of him in all studies on the history of the archeology of Udmurtia as a scientific secretary of the archaeological subdivocity of the Glavnauka.

In different archives and museums, it was possible to identify the still few information about the archaeologist, in need of systematization, in order to make an idea of ​​the personality of the scientist in the first approximation. This is important, since it was S. Matveev - the author of the first two research programs for the study of the archeology of Udmurtia, the implementation of which in the republic was not fully implemented to this day.

What is known about the researcher today? It can be reliably said that starting with the training gg. It is possible that this happened after the end of the department of archeology and the art of the faculty of social sciences at 1 Moscow State University, headed by the outstanding Russian archaeologist V. Матвеев вполне мог быть студентом именно этого отделения, поскольку «как правило, выпускники факультета общественных наук становились аспирантами Института археологии и искусствознания РАНИОН» [Янин и др.

К 1 января г. Арциховский, А. Брюсов, Б. Граков, П. Дмитриев, А. Дубынин, С. Киселев, А. Председателем секции был В. Городцов, секретарем - С. Матвеев [Кузьминых, Белозерова , ]. The work of S. Matveev as the secretary of the archaeological department of IAI is confirmed by information in the directory "All Moscow" for many years: [.

Bryusov [all of Moscow.This date coincides with the data from the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences that on January 18 G. Unfortunately, it has not yet been able to find out the theme of the dissertation S. thanks to the works of S. Kuzminykh and I. Belozerova, it is known that “V. Indirectly about the topic of dissertations of graduate students can be judged by their reports read at the meetings of the IAIA archeology section.

However, unlike the classmates of S. Matveev, it is quite difficult to judge the topic of his dissertation by reports: “Culture of the early pores of the neometallic era in Transcaucasia” [A review of activity. Training in graduate school included production practice, so that the graduate students of the IAI from the second year of study received the right to independent intelligence and excavations on the open sheet [Kuzminykh, Belozerova,].

So, graduate students A. Bryusov, P. Dmitriev began to conduct independent excavations to the graduate students of V. Gorodtsov published their first scientific works. In the reference book "Soviet archaeological literature. This publication quite fits into the theme of field research by S. Matveev and gives an indirect hint of why it was aimed at studying the monuments in the Wao: chronologically, they are close to the province already studied by him.

Matveev was called the scientist secretary of the archaeological subdivision of the Glavnauki, and not by the graduate student, which he was, as well as A., as well, that S. Matveev, simultaneously with training in graduate school, worked in the Glavneak under the leadership of V. Gorodtsov, who, as you know, did not prevent the work of graduate students in organizations that are related to archeology.

Working in the State Historical Museum of the GIM, he attracted his students to work in the museum. Belozerova write that "at the insistence of V. Gorodtsov, some graduate students parallel to the keepers in various departments of the museum" [Kuzminykh, Belozerov,]. During the years of graduate school, S. Matveev, simultaneously with work in Glavnaku, also worked in Gima, however, it is not known in which position.

This follows from the letters sent by him to and in the GG. He signs the first as “a researcher at the Institute of Archeology and Art of the State Historical Museum”, the second is “Researcher Gima” [Melnikova, 99]. The recognition of the scientific success of the graduate students of IAI was their participation, including S. Matveev, immediately goes to Kerch.