Granovo biography briefly

Of the poor noblemen: Grandfather G. In the youth years of the city of G. B to the city in the GG. Custer, in which, with all its many shortcomings, it was still possible to get a decent secondary education at that time; Moreover, G. however, due to the complete indifference of the father to the fate of the young man G. Time from the GG. This period of his life G. only in G. training here did not become a serious milestone in the life of G.

according to the fair remark by P. The only professor who attracted the attention of G. Pletnev, who read the course of ancient Russian literature, and even then, obviously, not so much his teaching and scientific talents, but vast acquaintances among literary luminaries. Like other students of Pletnev, G. Zhukovsky, V. Odoevsky, A. Stankevich was represented in his student years and was sent abroad for preparation for a professor’s rank in the department of universal history at Moscow University.

These events were interconnected thanks to the recommendations of one of Stankevich's friends V. Rzhevsky, who served as an official at the trustee of the Moscow training district S. Ranke and F. Raumer, geographer K. Ritter, philosopher E. Gans and K., G. Hegel, who had awakened at that time under the undoubted influence of Stankevich, who had long studied the German idealistic philosophy and subtly versed in it.

Hegel does not solve them, but everything that is now available to knowledge of a person, and his very knowledge is miraculously explained. Granovsky before his professorship in Moscow is a Russian conversation. The first lecture was given to G. soon it became the most popular lecturer at the university. And this is despite the fact that G., even G., even when the story really takes me by the soul, I try to cool myself and speak as before.

Granovsky and his correspondence. And, nevertheless, from the first year of G. work, the passages were forced by chairs; The listeners sat even on the steps of the department. At the same time, the popularity of G. Student records of lectures of the city of lectures on the history of the Middle Ages.

For all the complexity and fierce of this struggle, its good result is in the course of G. In essence, G., G., G. G. G. thundered, fought, mourned and departed, and he developed with amazing brightness protruded and perceived to others. His scheme never suppressed historical material. On a fair assessment of A. Herzen A., he took his way for a moral assessment of the past; He brought the story closer to the listeners, made it more humane.

All these remarkable qualities of G. was his fundamental position. I did not listen and did well. I will not make any concessions in the performance of my duties, but outside my duties I can not forbid being a friend with students. During this informal communication, it came to many issues that G. G. The simplicity of G. for the vast majority of his listeners G.

as regards the relationship of G. on the one hand, at this time, at the turn of the 10th. The lawyers N. Krylov, K. Kavelyn, the Anti-Anti-Stick, the historian P. Kudryavtsev, the librarian of the University of E. Korsh-were all close to a friend by age, in their inherent undergraduate beliefs and passion for Hegel, which for a long time, which seemed to be a united whole. Pogodin and S.

In this struggle, which went with varying successes, Pogodin with Shevyrev could count on the support of the Minister of Education of S. Uvarov, the creator of the theory professed by them. Stroganova, who constantly conflicting with Uvarov and enjoyed a certain authority and respect for Nicholas I himself. The conservative professor resigned himself and, with some external successes, lost the memories of S.

St. Petersburg, the general and quite fair opinion of contemporaries about G. was the same directly concerned with all this, it was necessary to figure it out and, having sorted it out, to teach, to teach, to teach. others. That is why the reading of the lecture course has become the main one for G. such an attitude cannot be determined as a purely popularizer-at least in relation to G., rather, it explains why G.

Protection of the dissertation, which took place in fierce controversy with professors-conservatives, and students-Students constantly supported G. After the defense of this dissertation, in the same year, G., as for the other scientific works of G., all of them are closely connected with the lecture course of G. in full accordance with their life attitudes G. He was one of the creators of Russian Westernism - it was through G.

Westernism G. G. G. Chaadaev’s public readings of G. Chaadaev, and they themselves were of historical importance. Like university lectures G. Their main goal, which G. Readings caused a negative review in the press S. Aksakov in his letters. It is no coincidence that the last attempt to reconcile these two parties was lunch in honor of the last years of the reign of Nicholas I - that is, on the one hand, it was a time of tense and fruitful thoughts during which G.In this speech, G.

At the same time, the life of G.